When pathogens breach the body’s defenses, the immune system scrambles into action. The adaptive arm, which includes T and B cells tailored to recognize specific threats, takes several days to ramp up a full response. In contrast, the innate immune system, though less precise, responds almost immediately, targeting broad molecular patterns common to many pathogens. For decades, immunologists adhered to this “innate-first, adaptive-second” framework. But a discovery fifteen years ago blurred that clear division.
Scientists identified a new family of cells known as innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), which carry out immune functions remarkably similar to T cells, but without the ability to recognize specific antigens. Like traditional innate cells, ILCs are fast-acting and respond to generalized danger signals. Yet, their actions mimic those of adaptive immune cells, particularly in how they orchestrate inflammation through cytokine secretion.
The breakthrough came in 2010, when Andrew McKenzie and his team at the University of Cambridge studied mice infected with intestinal worms. Existing models attributed the immune response to type-2 helper T cells (Th2s), which secrete interleukin-13 (IL-13) to flush out parasites via increased mucus production. However, the mice expelled the worms before T cells had time to mount a response, indicating another source of IL-13.
When the researchers administered IL-25, a cytokine known to stimulate Th2s, they observed a spike in IL-13-producing cells that lacked antigen receptors—clearly not T cells. McKenzie dubbed them “nuocytes,” though the name didn’t last. They are now known as type-2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2s).
Over time, scientists discovered additional types of ILCs, each mirroring a T cell counterpart. ILC1s behave like Th1 cells, combating viruses and intracellular pathogens. ILC3s echo Th17s in defending mucosal barriers, while natural killer (NK) cells, often grouped with ILCs, parallel cytotoxic T cells by killing infected or abnormal cells. These parallels arise from shared transcription factors that guide the cells’ development and functional specialization.
Despite these similarities, ILCs remain fundamentally innate. They lack antigen specificity, which means their responses are broad and fast—but not as precise. Unlike circulating T cells, most ILCs are stationed in tissues, ready to respond when local cells release alarm signals. For instance, parasites prompt the release of IL-25, activating ILC2s, while viruses trigger IL-12, spurring ILC1s into action.
Beyond fighting infections, ILCs are also emerging as key players in immune regulation. Gabrielle Belz, an immunologist at the Frazer Institute, emphasized that immune balance—not just combat—is a vital function. In conditions like allergies, exaggerated ILC2 responses may drive symptoms even in the absence of allergens. Unlike Th2 cells, which require antigen exposure, ILC2s react to more general cues, such as cytokines or microbial patterns, potentially explaining persistent allergic inflammation.
Interestingly, ILCs continue contributing after T cells enter the scene. They secrete cytokines and chemokines that attract and sustain T cell activity. Jenny Mjösberg of the Karolinska Institute likens ILCs to stage-setters for adaptive immunity. For example, ILC2s may help T cells locate and attack tumors by secreting pro-inflammatory signals that enhance T cell function.
This overlap between innate speed and adaptive strategy has sparked interest in ILCs as tools in cancer immunotherapy. Wilfred Jefferies at the University of British Columbia tested this idea by transferring ILC2s into mice with lung cancer. The result? Dramatically reduced tumor size. The key driver was IL-33, a cytokine known to activate ILC2s and support T cell infiltration into tumors.
Surprisingly, Jefferies found that ILC2s were 150 times more effective per cell than conventional T-cell therapies in this mouse model. Unlike T cells, which must be matched to tumor antigens—a time-consuming and risky process—ILCs act on inflammation, avoiding issues like autoimmune cross-reaction.
Yet, challenges remain. While ILCs avoid antigen mismatches, their broad reactivity carries risks of excessive inflammation. Mjösberg cautions that successful therapy will require fine-tuned regulation: “You can’t just inject these cells and hope for the best.”
As researchers unravel how ILCs are activated—and, crucially, how they’re turned off—these once-overlooked cells may redefine the boundaries between innate and adaptive immunity. In doing so, they offer new hope for treating disease while challenging immunology’s long-held assumptions.
Source:https://www.the-scientist.com/the-innate-immune-system-s-secret-weapon-73061
This is non-financial/medical advice and made using AI so could be wrong.